http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=zh-TW&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Farticle%2Fsilver-plunges-china-slowdown-concerns-dollar-short-covering
今朝一起身睇到...分享下...為咗方便部分睇開中文的同好,用咗google translate英轉中,所以可能有些字眼怪怪地,唔好意思.
101 則留言:
感謝chapman的分享, 所以大家千萬不要借錢買金銀, plz forgive me becoz I'm too lazy to explain the reason that is discussed b4
感覺現在很多technical skill和財演說的話都是花拳秀腿的虛招, 目的好明顯la, 唔使我講你地都知
金字塔成員出動elite鎮壓愚民搶金銀
Warren Buffett & Co are part of the financial elite which have been profiting for decades from the current (fiat) credit system.
This was once again confirmed during the Q&A, when Buffett answered a question regarding the debt ceiling of the US, and if it should be lifted.
Buffett: “The United States was not going to have a debt crisis of any kind as long as we keep issuing our notes in our own currency.”
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=auto&tl=zh-TW&u=http://www.zerohedge.com/article/warren-buffett-gold-and-some-other-silver-observations%25E2%2580%25A6&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhhhXyVMHoGNEsLLwozdl6PWW0tSkw
摩奸同匯豐的傑作
is that the right time to buy silver in this price ?
由燒烤 whitehou ...
on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 14:21 週日，2011年5月1日- 14:21
#1225727 ＃1225727
Warren Buffet doesn't like gold because he has no need of money.巴菲特不喜歡黃金，因為他沒有需要錢。 Warren lives in a world without money.沃倫生活在一個世界上沒有錢。
If Warren wants to buy something he calls the bank and the bank buys it for him or his company.如果沃倫想要買東西，他呼籲世行和銀行購買它為他或他的公司。 Theres no money involved its all credit and other peoples labor.世界上沒有涉及金錢的所有信貸及其他人民的勞動。
Warren is a slave master who buys up plantations, so in his world it would be silly to save the labor of his slaves in gold.沃倫是一個奴隸種植園主誰買了，所以在他的世界將是愚蠢挽救他的奴隸勞動的黃金。 Why would he need to?他為什麼會需要呢？ Slaves worked yesterday and they work today and will work tomarrow, why save that labor in gold.昨天和工作的奴隸，今天他們將工作tomarrow，為什麼保存黃金的勞動。
Unless those slaves wish to be free and demand somthing besides printed script from the banks.除非那些希望獲得自由的奴隸和需求的財產以後，除了從銀行打印的腳本。 Then old Warren would have to pay free people in "value" not just other slaves future labor.然後舊沃倫便要付出自由人“值”不只是其他奴隸未來勞動力。
So from Warrens point of view it makes no sense to save when you can leverage future slave labor and pay a free credit script instead.因此，從沃倫斯的角度來看是沒有意義的，除非你可以利用未來的奴隸勞動和付出，而不是免費的信用腳本。
But now the games been run and other powers seek protection from slaves who no longer see this "future slave credit" as valuable.但現在已經運行的遊戲和其他權力尋求保護，從奴隸誰再也看不到這個“未來奴隸誠信”為寶貴。 These young slaves will need to be paid in somthing that they see has value into the future or they will not offer labor in return.這些年輕的奴隸將需要支付的財產以後，他們看到了走向未來的價值，否則將不提供勞動的回報。 They may even turn violent and no one wants a slave revolt.他們甚至可能演變成暴力，沒有人想要一個奴隸起義。
So gold and silver may need to be added as a sweetener to the slave labor script.因此，黃金和白銀可能需要增加一條，作為甜味劑的奴隸勞動腳本。 Even if its pulled later before it ever is paid out.即使其拉後來它曾經是前支付。 As was done in '65. 1965就是這樣做的。
wan兄好!
現在是資訊爆炸的年代,不論金甲,銀甲,紙甲的言論,他們本身都有自己的既定立場,有點偏頗好正常.不需太執著,最重要每人有自己的獨立分析力.
technical analysis,不可說沒有用,也不可盡信...自己在這方面知識好貧乏,只是看別人的分析,自己參考一下...
在這裡討論的,道理上對實金,實銀的價值都已心中有數,也絕大部分一早入了市,這些價錢上落,走勢分析,都有好大程度,當看小說而已....
我很想重讀西歐史，想了解更多中古時間既歐洲係一個點樣既社會。
如果說現在今天的社會係一個公平的社會，不如說是一個手段更進步的奴隸社會。
由Alex44
on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 14:58 週日，2011年5月1日- 14時58分
#1225778 ＃1225778
Warren Buffet's father was in favor of a gold standard.巴菲特的父親是贊成一個黃金標準。 What happend to the Oracle of Omaha?發生了什麼到Oracle奧馬哈？
by Bansters-in-my-...由Bansters合我的- ...
on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 15:23 週日，2011年5月1日- 15時23分
#1225803 ＃1225803
“Gold gets dug out of the ground, then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it. “金得翻出地面，然後我們融化了下去，挖一個洞，再埋人，並支付站在一旁守護著它。 It has no utility. 它沒有效用。 Anyone watching from Mars would be scratching their head.” 任何人都注視著火星會撓著頭。“
Well of coarse any fuckhead agent of Rothschilds would say that. 那麼粗任何fuckhead代理人會說，羅斯柴爾德家族。
Thats why those banksta's have all that yellow commodity in thier vaults.(supposedly) 這就是為什麼那些banksta的那黃色的商品都在他們的金庫。（據說）
by halflink123由halflink123
on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 17:25 週日，2011年5月1日- 17:25
#1225976 ＃1225976
Yes Buffett's argument that gold has no value "because it doesn't pay a dividend" etc., while plausible on the surface, seems intended to mislead.是巴菲特的說法，黃金沒有價值“，因為它不支付股息”等，而美國可能對從表面上看，似乎是有意誤導。 Gold when thought of as a CURRENCY of course does not pay a dividend.當想到黃金作為貨幣，當然不支付股息。 There are NO CURRENCIES that pay dividends.沒有貨幣的支付股利。 It's what you buy with the currency - food, clothing, oil, and stocks - (the latter) that would pay the dividend.這是你買的貨幣 - 食品，服裝，石油和股票 - （後者），將支付股息。 It's such a misleading statement because it compares apples to oranges.它的這種誤導性的陳述，因為它比較蘋果和橘子。 It would be like me saying - don't buy clothing; don't buy food etc. - they are worthless because they don't pay dividends.這就像我說 - 不買衣服，不買食品等 - 他們是毫無價值，因為他們不付股息。 Clearly human beings buy things other than stocks - none of those things pay dividends.顯然，人類以外的其他股票買東西 - 這些東西沒有支付股利。 In fact, the ONLY thing that pays a dividend is a stock.事實上，唯一，支付的股息的股票。
Anyway I just wonder why Buffett would go to such lenghts to bash gold.無論如何，我只是奇怪，為什麼巴菲特會去這樣 lenghts bash的黃金。 I mean, if people want to buy it as an alternative to the dollar, what is the big deal?我的意思是，如果人們想購買它作為美元的替代品是什麼大不了的？ Yes I think the real reason he hates it is because it gets people out of the fiat-Wall Street game, and we've seen time and again that he loves that game.是的，我認為真正的原因，他恨那是因為它讓人們走出了菲亞特華爾街的比賽，我們已經看到了一次又一次，他喜歡這個遊戲。 He is always hyping stocks and bonds.他總是炒作股票和債券。
美國政府,FED,同相關金融機構和權力集團.要美國在這兩個月'轉強',似乎是好明顯...只是,會用什麼手段...就十分耐人尋味,引人入勝...好睇過戲.
Chapman: technical analysis,不可說沒有用,也不可盡信...自己在這方面知識好貧乏,只是看別人的分析,自己參考一下...
我就是technical analysis的人版, 所謂聰明返被聰明誤, 一點也沒有講錯, 現今的technical analysis所帶出的訊息、信息和供求關係已被人為地和有計劃兼精心策劃地被操控和被扭曲, 結論: 1)目的係分散群眾的注意力, 等佢地唔使搶金銀, technical analysis係信唔過o既, 當technical analysis的圖表看小說或者係漫畫入面d插圖就無乜妨礙....
Satan Wong呢句講得好好, 十分有同感:
現在是一個手段更進步的奴隸社會。
wan兄,post條link得啦.攪到咁長好難睇..不過唔好介意,我個人對巴生無興趣...
soros好睇啲,起碼在娛樂性方面....
美國政府,FED,同相關金融機構和權力集團.要美[金]在這兩個月'轉強',似乎是好明顯...只是,會用什麼手段...就十分耐人尋味,引人入勝...好睇過戲
[[[之前打錯字...]]] >_<
剛看了一半[貨幣戰爭], 原來經濟循環周期唔係一個自然的規律, 係柴爾德背後的銀行家人為所造成.
通貨膨脹/緊縮, 戰爭, 暗殺, 總統人選, 都是由呢班人一手造成.
他們創造了銀行, 享有貨幣發行權, 掌握經濟命脈, 吸取人民的血液.
整合了之前看完的[富爸爸買賣貴金屬], 發現我們的對社會經濟知識真是無知, 我們的教育被背後的銀行家剝奪了學習財務教育的機會, 使到很多人一生都在金錢的泥沼上掙扎.
我們只能夠從這些書本一點一滴去了解背後貨幣的秘密. 當我們了解這個貨幣系統之後, 驚訝醒覺發現我們一直都只是一班城巿中的奴隸.
我之前的借錢言論似乎中了背後銀行家的陷阱, 今天銀價暴跌殺了班槓桿炒家. 借錢是雙面刀, 可帶你去天堂, 也可以帶你去地獄.
大家想利用借錢工具去買實貨要想清楚, 一定要清楚了解你的工具!
satan,係架,如果唔係,就唔會有咁多人想有[財政自由]啦.一係俾心機啲搵錢,一係唔好介意生活好簡樸(即係[窮])
chapman 提到...
wan兄,post條link得啦.攪到咁長好難睇..不過唔好介意,我個人對巴生無興趣...
原本都想用link, 不過方便懶人觀看, 貼出黎唔使佢地揾得咁辛苦, 哈哈 ^-^
-------------------------------
回大風暴: 你終於都明白很多很多不能說的真相和秘密, 恭喜你呀 ^-^
大兄,係架,小心風險呀.不過做margin同開定息loan有好大分別...
同埋唔洗咁重怨氣,傷身架!
wan兄果真有心思,不過有心睇,自然會去,無心睇post,都係skip架啫
既然經濟循環是人為所造成, 我覺得沒有必要再硏究馬田大師的理論.
小心會走火入魔!
其實我看到 Charen Wan 就會 skip , 如果呢個 forum 有 auto filter function 會有多好 !
最新消息：本拉登已經死亡。
奧巴馬即將發表聲明。
各人見解看法不同, 要尊重不同的看法
在那裡聽回來: 拉登死亡?????????????????????
to 大風暴:
這里的電視都在播，美國總統馬上會發表特別聲明。
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/art_main.php?&iss_id=20110502&sec_id=10793140&art_id=50011145
http://usawatchdog.com/war-in-libya-is-there-more-to-the-libyan-war-than-the-removal-of-gadhafi/
廢美元，行金本位，或者係打利比亞嘅理由之一...
據說是被一槍爆頭～
尸體在美軍手中～
chapman 提到...
wan兄果真有心思,不過有心睇,自然會去,無心睇post,都係skip架啫
2011年5月2日上午10:31
oic, understood
突而奇來的消息~
往後又有什麼事情要發生~
金錢一一 提到...
http://usawatchdog.com/war-in-libya-is-there-more-to-the-libyan-war-than-the-removal-of-gadhafi/
廢美元，行金本位，或者係打利比亞嘅理由之一...
Good post! Thanks!
拉登已死關條[銀]事????????
奧巴馬原定10：30 ET講話，現在已經幾次推遲了～
又一個[黑天鵝]事件薄
美元反彈中??
2003年5月1日（同一日），布殊總統宣布伊拉克戰斗結束～
現在公佈拉登死訊, 代表美國要撤出阿富汗了. 搵個藉口者. 家下北非同中東火頭甚多, 急需撲滅. 君不見東亞地區已沒什麼新聞了嗎?
閒人
剛看了一半[貨幣戰爭]；
既然經濟循環是人為所造成, 我覺得沒有必要再硏究馬田大師的理論.
小心會走火入魔；
-------------------------
風暴兄,
此言差矣，你才看了貨幣戰爭1的一半，入門基本而已。資深金銀甲們，長時間投入心力，研究多種不同資料，仍對馬田大師的理論推薦，必然有因，況且joe兄閉關多日研究其理論，想必其有可取之處。
我自己的信念是金銀甲之間的知識高低，必有深淺之別，卻無妨交流。但謙虛和禮儀就必需注意。
如因知識淺薄，有禮貌地向別人請教，我相信必有禮貌的回應；
但即使擁有高深的金銀知識，卻無禮貌地嘲笑新手知識淺薄，便會令人討厭。
走火入魔一詞屬貶義，我兄宜慎用之。
大蒼蠅最叻哇眾取寵
Gordon兄對蒼蠅都如此憐憫賜教
小蒼蠅實十分佩服
小蒼蠅
小蒼蠅，不要老是抽人水,不要沾其他人的口水尾,請你實際講出你的見解!!!
如果堅持舉債買金的話, 還是有法子不踩銀行家的陷阱的. 就是借銀行錢買同一家銀行的黃金產品. 例如借恒生錢買恒生財神金牌...
因為銀行放債需要債務人把錢花掉, 存進另一家銀行內. 這樣貨幣總數會被放大, 銀行得益最大. 如果借錢買同一家銀行的黃金, 錢沒有轉出去, 貨幣總數沒有被放大, 銀行的得益消失.
所以銀行借出 personal loan 時總會問你會拿來幹甚麼. 如果你老實地答用來買貴行的黃金的話, 銀行多半會拒絕借錢.
還是那句老話, 不要舉債買金. 這樣就不會踩陷阱. 無論金價如何暴升暴跌, 你也不會因此損手.
Gordon 提到...
走火入魔一詞屬貶義，我兄宜慎用之。
------------------------------------------------
Gordon, charen:
though i sometimes dont like 風暴's wordings, i think he is partly correct this time! cause i hv been studying MA ECM for years, but lately his trend has been out of track! if you can refer to DOW n HSI !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_creation
點解呢度咁多人對所有野一知半解 , 但係又咁多主見 ?!
大蒼蠅你好多時都係留埋d廢話架啦
做咩成日叫人唔好抽水呀
你呢隻大蒼蠅講quantity唔講quality
做乜突然又反常起來?
小蒼蠅
匿名提到...
Gordon, charen:
though i sometimes dont like 風暴's wordings, i think he is partly correct this time! cause i hv been studying MA ECM for years, but lately his trend has been out of track! if you can refer to DOW n HSI !
----------------------------------------------
Really? Can you provide some examples? I've just start reading the articles.
But I did spot that his prediction of the 'possible Gold low' is different. In 2010, he predicted the 'possible low' would be on 22nd June, 2011 while that 'low' became 13th June in the more recent articles.
小初哥:
u r very smart! discrepencies in prediction is possible, bcos nothing is certained in our universe, it is the rule!
jun13/14 is the key! since his ECM was created almost 20yrs ago, well at first, i hv to clearify that i m not arrowing his theory, but theory is dead, our brain is alive, and trend is changing everyday! wait, let me quote Joe's ...
根據大師1999年的文章，各周期如下：
1998年7月20日→頂部 / 香港樓市及股市就是於這個日子前後見頂
2002年8月11日→底部 / 如果此時投資股市及樓市，至2007年沽售，亦會獲利。
2007年2月27日→頂部 / 次按爆煲一般以2007年4月新世紀金融公司破產為起點，預測頗準。
2011年6月18日→底部
2015年7月10日→頂部...pls also refer to MA ECM model.
8.6 yrs is good to predict a whole cycle. pls notice there should be a dead-cat-bounce(wave B + C)to complete a whole correction in bear market! you can see a bounce peak at 2009 in ECM, but we knew that 2009 was the starting time for "bull", why should there be a peak?! MA was correct, he was right! the only reason was 2008 impact was too deep, it could not reflect the crrection untill 2009 march!
why? the plunge was extended to 2009 mar! meaning that the dead-cat-bounce has not finished yet!
2011年6月18日→底部- may be its a 底 , 14week-cycle, 16week-cycle 底, there are many cycle top n bottom, but i am sure its not the 底 for a bull! because when a bear has not finished yet, how could a bull start?
wait a minute, i m not saying MA made mistake, i believe he used a statistics to predict economy cycle 20yrs ago, but he would not have predicted there would be QE 20 yrs later!!
QE have changed the whole economy system! adn so is gold!
the truth is no one can really tell you what s gonna happen tomorrow! because there are too many factors that are unpredictable! who could predict 311 japan quake? who can predict buffet suddenly came out a gave a gold speach? the only thing which is still certain is- its a working day tomorrow, apart from this anything can happen! anything can affect the market !
Thz! May I ask if the 3 匿名s above the same person?
One more thing to ask, in MA also have a 11-year cylce for gold. The cycle could be disrupted by some sudden events like Panic 1907 so that the 11-year cycle was extended. (The panic 1907 extended the cycle from 11 years to 13 years. If take out the Panic, the cycle length remains the same.)
Is the 11 year cycle linked to the 8.6 year theory? and can it be used to explain why the ECm doesn't go right?
1- yes same person
2- yes, if there is nothing unexpected, cycle length should remain same according to his theory, both 11 yrs n 8.6 yrs are created out of same theory. and it was tested true.
but if something unexpected takes place, this trend will change!
我睇 MA 既周期理同占星學一樣 , 信則有 . 而且人類既時間觀相對宇宙歷史期實好短暫 , 批評周期法則不全在實在過於狂妄 . 不過 MA 既周期精確度去到月份 , 我就一定話佢係吹水 !
認識美國聯儲局真正的面紗:
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/louzpj4Se7w/
snoopy 提到...
我睇 MA 既周期理同占星學一樣 , 信則有 . 而且人類既時間觀相對宇宙歷史期實好短暫
-----------------------------------------------
agree! thats why i think 大風暴 "走火入魔" is quite correct, because when you undersatnd all his theory.then you will find out there are too many unpredictables and unexpectables, because nothing is certain and everything is ever changing in the whole universe ! if you cling to one theory, you will be attached to it, and miss the whole others! and one more interesting thing, if you count 2012, of corse we dunno whats gonna happen after 2012, this trend wont even work! his theory doesnt apply !
My view at MA's theory is negative. It is because of I learned the foundation level of 易經 and found conflict between 易經 and MA's theory. I think 易經 that it is the highest theory for predicting any trend in the world.
Ｆor an example, Ｊoe used Ｍa's ＥＣＭ for comparing the trend of ＨＫ's economic in past and found that it is miraculous matching with ＭＡ's theory. Ｂut why the prediction was correct for ＨＫ, not correct for other objection, such as Ｃhina?
Ｐls correct me if Ｉ am wrong.
呢度開始多雜音 ! 記注: 到掃地阿嬸, 街市婆都叫你買金銀時就好走減 d 啦 XD !
Gordon: i m on your side! 易經 is a macro metaphysic, much braoder and cover the whole universe, so it predicts the unpredictables n unexpectables!
in fact i dun even think ECM match hk's market!
check this:
根據大師1999年的文章，各周期如下：
1998年7月20日→頂部 / 香港樓市及股市就是於這個日子前後見頂
(in fact 1997/oct 樓市及股市見頂)
2002年8月11日→底部 / 如果此時投資股市及樓市，至2007年沽售，亦會獲利。
(in fact 2003/may 股市及樓市見底)
2007年2月27日→頂部 / 次按爆煲一般以2007年4月新世紀金融公司破產為起點，預測頗準。
(in fact 2007/nov 股市見頂)
PS: if u could remember; "investment thru-train" was announced aug 17, 2007. even after his prediction 2007年2月27日→頂部!
To:Snoopy,
但有一樣我不明白，連神秘組織都忌左佢，莫須有地捉佢坐監，唔俾佢再出文章，即係佢的理論有掂的地方，會對神秘組織做成麻煩，呢個係事實。
而且168的師兄和Joe都對他的理論推薦，所以我依家叠埋心水等Joe兄個篇出關大文，再睇睇。
joe兄閉關多日，講明是研究馬田大師的理論，風暴兄就話，"我覺得沒有必要再硏究馬田大師的理論.小心會走火入魔!"，不是明諷Joe兄嗎？
因此處是joe兄網誌，所以我提醒他慎用言詞。
我沒有要挑戰joe哥, 只是我發表個人意見, 不代表其他人.
不要過份對數字過份的執着, 循環周期已被證實是由國際銀行家的人為結果, 為何還要對數學有過份的迷思呢?
說不定馬田大師只是由銀行家安排下的一隻棋子呢?
以上純粹個人意見.
我們認清楚掌握貨幣生死大權的是銀行家, 他們的每一次決定都包含了自身利益考慮.人民在這班銀行家銀中只是一隻待殺的肥羊.
說不定馬田大師只是由銀行家安排下的一隻棋子呢?
-----------------------------
以前佢好地地由財務專家變監犯，連拘留期計算，一共坐了11年監，呢個係事實，我不相信這是場戲，亦無必要。
但在依個敏感時刻放番出來，就暫時不確定佢有冇"被"和諧了。
哈哈，風暴兄，老宋有樣野唔敢講，我講埋俾你知啦，大陸的貨幣生死大權不是由銀行家操控的。
大風暴
The cycles actually goes back into history, before bankers were in power. It goes back to Roman/Greek i think... as long as there is data for MA to analysis.
What MA is interested is the FLOW OF HOT MONEY. Where does this smart money flowing into and out of
今天發生甚麼事? 銀價一下只跌個四腳朝天...
拉登死了就有這麼強的效果? 但別的商品(金,原油) 都沒有這種現象...
結合中西方兩本書對貨幣深切的分析, 貨幣的世界圖像已很清晰展現出來.
以這種思路去分析當前各種社會現象, 你會發覺以前解不開的問題好就一下子找到了正確的答案!
你們有看過[美國從自由到法西斯]?
大風暴的知識在進步中, 加油呀 , 快d睇埋貨幣戰爭2之金權天下la, 好戲在"後頭"
看完才知道你們不要再執迷於什麼循環理論了, 它只是由一班銀行家隨心所慾去決定!
大風暴 提到...
看完才知道你們不要再執迷於什麼循環理論了, 它只是由一班銀行家隨心所慾去決定!
大風暴唔好咁早下定論住la, 你睇埋第2部之後先la ^-^
http://pdf.wenweipo.com/2011/03/31/a28-0331.pdf
15年後白銀價格超越黃金價格!!
Charen Wan 已經熟讀了宋大師的著作?
銀價已回升至46.8了
早上借拉登之死去重挫白銀
點解joe兄咁耐都唔上來/?;
有好多人話白銀今日的回調只是開始喎, 話最終下跌到30美元一盎司(以大調整計). 如果係普通的就下跌到$37喎...有無咁嘅可能呀?
一個二個話白銀下跌等於美國撤出中東??!
Marco
我個人心想:白銀依家先至係$17.X一盎司(用1980年的貨幣購買力計).
now and futures 呢個網站話過要見$130(現價)先至等於1980年的$50美元高位.
大家慢慢等...唔洗咁快賣出去架.
Marco
大風暴 提到...
Charen Wan 已經熟讀了宋大師的著作?
2011年5月2日下午10:42
已拜讀, 相信你也可以及早讀完這2部金甲必修著作, 加油
需明白 休息是為要走更遠的路 這個道理, 無需太在意留言的數量, 返而我也在學習"等待"呢, 在這個時間不妨讀多點有益的著作吧
Charen Wan,我好心提你丫
你咁樣講,大蒼蠅會話你串佢架
你咁講佢會覺得你話呢度係大陸,冇言論自由架,唔比佢留言架
希望我咁講左大蒼蠅唔會話你啦!
小蒼蠅
感謝小蒼蠅提點,
我o既出發點只係想大家可以互相扶持, 別無他意, 如有不敬之意, 請大風暴見諒
點解joe兄咁耐都唔上來/?;
----------------------------
一路有睇你地討論，但要閉關研究馬田大師循環理論，正在寫文章中，各位努力！
小蒼蠅不要再作挑撥離間, 難道你是聯儲局派來打壓我們的特使?
香港有你地先會進步, 睇下美國人,還活在夢中, 整天認為自己世界強國, 其實井底之蛙, 大家有這樣的辨論其實真的有益,唔係點進步....(最近其實睇唔過眼好多美國人做事手段,欺壓中國人....)
大蒼蠅,好開心,你終於發覺唔係摩奸同獅子打壓銀幣,而係聯儲局。我比你用審犯的語氣追問幾次都係藉得。
By FED
大蒼蠅你可以再誇張d我唔mind
但就算要打壓都唔係搞你追住你啦
168 咁多大大 呢度仲有joe兄bosco兄等等
你何得何能呀 我只係睇唔過眼你賣野又唔認咋
我預左你睇完我上一句會繼續選擇性失明架喇
小蒼蠅
「呢度開始多雜音 ! 記注: 到掃地阿嬸, 街市婆都叫你買金銀時就好走減 d 啦 XD !」
小弟見呢度咁多雜音，迷信，流言，就係無邏輯和分析，已係46蚊沽晒d銀，多謝各位支持，祝好運
Alex
Alex，
如閣下因這裡這三天間的討論而沽晒d實銀，請問可否轉告我，這三天之間在香港那里有機構開門營業收賣實銀，謝。
白銀戰隊Heater Chun=大風暴???
匿名你而家先知?
不過都未算太遲...
Gordon
兩個星期前開始沽，上星期沽晒，分幾次沽，賣晒全屋所有銀，持貨8-10年，亦有在本blog其他版面留言，上星期五還沽突，昨天急插有點幸運，現在還未平空倉，祝大家好運。
Alex,
May I know how many silver did you sell?
這是trader的秘密，況且我又不知道你是誰
Alex
有人打壓金價銀價不是好事嗎？ 等大家可以買多d，買平d，如果有人打壓艾風既價格就好羅，打到一千蚊一部就好羅…
Alex
很多聰明錢喎!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Alex，
你也是Freeman01嗎？
請問你沽光銀的原因是什么呢？
是打算跌到3x才買番嗎？為何之前無賣，今次50大關又賣呢？
誰是 Freeman01 ?
今次個銀跌下來，並不普通pullback咁簡單，我d銀是十倍之前買的，講得明白點吧，smartmoney都在出貨/已經出貨，3x可能會平空倉，祝大家好運
Alex
請詳細解釋一下這次跌浪的原因, 不要淨係晒你既戰績
Alex，
Haha，good!
so...yours money is smarter than smartmoney. And, you r a windsurfer and suffering the wave !
各位,
有冇睇過黎兩篇文? 提到其實 FED 同 Greenspan 可能係 good guy:
http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/101.cfm
http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/230.cfm
Τhanks on your marvelous posting! Ι rеally enјoуed rеading it, you're a great author.I will remember to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back someday. I want to encourage yourself to continue your great work, have a nice morning!
Also visit my page - smokedating.com
Hi thеrе! This is my firѕt viѕit tо уour
blog! We are a сollection of volunteers and staгtіng a neω initiative in a cоmmunity in the ѕame nіche.
Υour blog prοvided us beneficial information to work
on. Yоu have done a mаrvellous jοb!
my blog post - LeaseWeb
Hi, I want tо subscrіbe for this ωebpage to
obtain lаtest updates, therefore where can і do it plеase helρ.
Also visit my web-sіte ... http://Onlinebedesten.org/blogs/entry/what-function-do-display-Screen-residences
張貼留言